Throughout the evening, Roy explains that writing fiction for her isn’t a duty. There were twenty years between publishing her previous novel The God of Small Things and The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. They were planning on demonstrating the evening, but instead showed up and heckled Roy throughout the evening. Unfortunately, there were protests against Roy’s critical opinion and the evening had to be cut short.īefore going to the event, I’d already seen an article on Tzum about a Dutch-Indian group rallying against Arundhati Roy’s visit to the Netherlands. Ernest van der Kwast interviewed the Indian author about her new book, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness.
![roxane gay hunger discussion questions roxane gay hunger discussion questions](https://blogs.hope.edu/english/wp-content/uploads/sites/42/2020/06/Memoir-Essay-1024x1024.png)
Think about yourself now.I visited the most recent Boek&Meester event with Arundhati Roy in de Doelen. How does Gay’s essay use these appeals? Give specific examples.Ĥ. On the Purdue OWL site, there is a section about Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, logos, telos, and kairos. How does she do this? In what ways does she connect these two topics?ģ. Gay takes two topics that we may not naturally consider together – The Hunger Games and her own past trauma – and puts them in conversation with each other. What rhetorical choices does Gay seem to be making in “What We Hunger For”? How do you determine what those choices might be?Ģ. Specific Questions (These are the types of questions to help guide your thinking for the “deeper” conversation we will be having in class.):ġ. What might are the similarities and differences between medium/media and genre? What are the type of things we should consider when thinking about our audience?Ĥ. How do the different aspects of rhetorical situation (audience, purpose, etc.) affect one another? For example, how is an email to a professor different from an email to a friend? What choices do you make when you decide to send an email to someone specific?ģ. What is YOUR definition of rhetorical situation?Ģ.
![roxane gay hunger discussion questions roxane gay hunger discussion questions](https://www.themomoftheyear.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/summer-reading-list.png)
General Questions (These will help you with note-taking and understanding terms and concepts.):ġ. Readings to be discussed: Norton Field Guide chapters 1-6, Purdue OWL’s Rhetorical Situation section, Roxane Gay’s “What We Hunger For” If we start to recognize and understand the ways in which literacy is in pursuit of individuals, then how do we now discuss the things we are doing in this class? What power systems do I – as your teacher – and Purdue as your university represent in this classroom? How do we complicate literacy or literacies? Perhaps the most interesting and surprising of Brandt’s phrasing comes at the end of the article, when she says that “as we assist and study individuals in pursuit of literacy, we also recognize how literacy is in pursuit of them.” How does this relate to Brandt’s larger argument in this essay?ħ. How does Brandt’s model of literacy sponsors relate to the ways we are defining “composition” in this class?Ħ. Brandt’s case studies show different forms of literacy, including technological. How does Brandt relate literacy and access? Access to what?ĥ. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?Ĥ. Brandt makes the compelling argument that “literacy takes its shapes from the interests of its sponsors” (p. What does Brandt mean by “economies of literacy” and how do sponsors fit into those economies?ģ. How does Brandt define “sponsors” of literacy? How does it differ from the way you might define “sponsors” of literacy?Ģ. To get you thinking and ready for class discussion, here are some questions to think about:ġ. Not everyone will agree with what this article has to say, so don’t be afraid to speak you mind – respectfully – in class when we discuss this pieces.
#ROXANE GAY HUNGER DISCUSSION QUESTIONS FREE#
Please feel free to dissent and defend when you feel it is appropriate. I will expect class discussion time to be a little more lively than usual.
![roxane gay hunger discussion questions roxane gay hunger discussion questions](https://hips.hearstapps.com/ell.h-cdn.co/assets/17/24/1497282512-elm070117esroxanegay-004.jpg)
“Sponsors of Literacy” is one of the more difficult pieces we will read this semester, but it is also very engaging and rewarding. Reading to be discussed: Deborah Brandt, “Sponsors of Literacy”